Rendering - Week 12

The article was published on  Phys.org site,   on October 4, 2012 by Angela Herring and which is called "Are we justified in our fights to save endangered species?" and discusses the problem of  rapidly changing ecosystem conditions, that make it unfeasible and ethically inappropriate to maintain species preservation as a primary ecosystem management goal. The author admits, that many of the current conservation efforts remain appropriate, including protecting the wilderness and establishing wildlife corridors and moreover, adds, that different efforts to preserve species endangered by climate change are a costly and ineffective protocol .Angela Herring can't ignore the fact ,that  such issues of species modification and the creation of new species through genetic engineering are essential.  The author points out the fact, that there is nothing intrinsically problematic with genetic modification, and an important ethical question isn't  "genetically modified" ',but rather other issues like human rights and public health and in order to prove his words he used the example of two distinct genetically modified organisms with vastly different social implications. Analysing the situation, it's neccessary to admit, that the first is a genetically modified grass created to improve golf fairway conditions that's resistant to herbicide and can quickly spread to other areas.  It wouldn't be unfair for the author not to say , that enetically modified yeast strain created to produce artemisinic acid, a precursor to an effective antimalarial drug, helps people in low-​​income countries by addressing their basic health needs.  It's a noticeable fact that , with respect to humans, many people have argued that the Homo sapiens species has special moral significance that sets it apart from other species. In conclusion, the author gives us  a chance to understand his aim message, speaking, that the reason we should be more concerned about the welfare of a human being isn't because it's Homo sapiens but because of their cognitive and psychological capacities. In my opinion, the author's words have a great degree of prophecy if we speak about a future life. The rescue of drowning is the case of drowning. But in this case, this winged phrase doesn't  make any sense, because the opportunity to save the natural world only in the hands of people.